City Ranking

Worst Real Estate Agent in San Francisco

Review-risk ranking for real estate agents in San Francisco, California, built from active source rows and bad-review signals.

11 Ranked Agents
10 Source Records
May 2026 Updated

Agent Rankings

Rows are sorted by bad review count. The risk score is out of 10: 10 bad reviews equals 1 point, and 100 or more equals 10/10.

Current source San Francisco, California

Agent data on this page is pulled from publicly available review and profile records for this market.

Risk score Out of 10

Ten bad reviews equals one risk point. Scores are capped at 10/10 once an agent reaches 100 or more bad reviews.

Bad reviews Review-risk count

Bad-review counts represent negative client-experience signals used to rank the records on this city page.

Evidence snapshot San Francisco at a glance
Ranked agents 11
Bad-review signals 650+
Highest risk 10/10
Freshness May 2026
Community signal

Had direct experience with an agent in San Francisco?

Submit a confidential vote. Your email is captured for verification, but your name is not shown publicly.

11 agents in San Francisco
1 Patrick Lam

Patrick Lam

Century 21 Masters

10/10Risk score 100Bad reviews
2 Nick Cooper

Nick Cooper

Compass

9/10Risk score 90Bad reviews
3 Ron Salter

Ron Salter

Compass Real Estate

8/10Risk score 80Bad reviews
4 Leslie Bauer

Leslie Bauer

City Real Estate

7/10Risk score 70Bad reviews
5 Jennifer Burden and Carren Shagley

Jennifer Burden and Carren Shagley

Legacy Real Estate

6/10Risk score 60Bad reviews
6 Bobbi Levenson

Bobbi Levenson

Corcoran Icon Properties

5/10Risk score 50Bad reviews
7 Paul Barbagelata

Paul Barbagelata

BarbCo Real Estate (Barbagelata)

4/10Risk score 40Bad reviews
8 Eric Li

Eric Li

Compass

3/10Risk score 30Bad reviews
9 Eddie O'Sullivan

Eddie O'Sullivan

Elevation Real Estate

2/10Risk score 20Bad reviews
10 Bobbi and Suhl

Bobbi and Suhl

Zephyr Real Estate

1/10Risk score 10Bad reviews

San Francisco remains one of the most expensive and competitive real estate markets in the world, though the post-pandemic era brought meaningful price corrections in certain segments — particularly downtown condos and SoMa high-rises affected by remote work shifts. The city's iconic neighborhoods each carry distinct character and pricing: Pacific Heights and the Marina command ultra-luxury premiums, Noe Valley and Cole Valley attract families, and the Mission and Dogpatch appeal to younger buyers.

San Francisco, California market overview

The city's 7x7-mile footprint creates inherent supply constraints that support long-term values. Victorian and Edwardian housing stock gives SF its architectural identity, and TIC (tenancy-in-common) ownership remains a uniquely San Francisco path to homeownership. Buyers should budget for seismic retrofit considerations and understand the city's strict rent control ordinances.

Review Signals

These categories make bad-review data easier to understand in San Francisco without relying on a single score alone.

Poor communication

Slow replies, unclear updates, missing context, or clients feeling ignored during the transaction.

Misleading advice

Reports that guidance, pricing expectations, or transaction details were presented in a way clients later disputed.

Pressure tactics

Clients describing rushed decisions, uncomfortable urgency, or pressure to move forward before they were ready.

Missed deadlines

Complaints involving late follow-up, missed paperwork, delayed responses, or deadline-sensitive mistakes.

Billing issues

Concerns about commission expectations, fees, payment communication, or transaction cost surprises.

Unprofessional conduct

Review themes involving respect, reliability, conduct, conflict handling, or client care.

Consumer guidance

What to do before choosing an agent in San Francisco

01Compare the risk score with the bad-review count instead of relying on the score alone.

02Look for repeated complaint themes, especially communication, pressure, and missed deadlines.

03Check whether the agent's brokerage, market, and recent profile data match the transaction you need help with.

04Use the investigation form if a record looks fake, misleading, private, or unrelated to a real client experience.

See something that's not right?

If you believe a review or ranking is fake, misleading, from someone who was not a client, contains private information or violates our review policy, you can request an investigation here.

FAQ

Common questions about San Francisco rankings, source records, and community votes.

How are agents selected for San Francisco?

Agents are included based on publicly available profile and review data for San Francisco. They're ranked by the number of negative reviews on record, with the highest-risk agents listed first.

What does the risk score mean?

The risk score is a simple measure of how many complaints an agent has. For every 10 bad reviews, one point is added to their score, up to a maximum of 10/10. A higher score means more negative client experiences are on record.

Are community votes public?

No. Your vote is completely confidential. We collect your email to verify the submission and prevent abuse, but your name is never requested or shown anywhere on the site.

Can an agent challenge a listing?

Yes. Any agent, or anyone else, can request an investigation if they believe a listing is inaccurate, misleading, or based on a fake review. We review every request and will correct or remove records that don't meet our review policy.